Annmarie Serem v. Commissioner, Soc Sec

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Annmarie Serem v. Commissioner, Soc Sec

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1518

ANNMARIE SEREM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02705-JMC)

Submitted: January 28, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Daniel Mayes, SMITH, MASSEY, BRODIE, GUYNN & MAYES, P.A., Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Molly E. Carter, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Annmarie Serem appeals the district court’s order accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the

Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability

insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s

determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are

supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law

was applied. See Mascio v. Colvin,

780 F.3d 632, 634

(4th Cir.

2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the

administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. Serem v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 1:13-cv-

02705-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished