U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Jeff Farmer v. MHM Maryland, Inc.

Jeff Farmer v. MHM Maryland, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 29, 2016 · Shedd, Harris, Davis
634 F. App'x 925

Jeff Farmer v. MHM Maryland, Inc.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeff Farmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motions to reexamine filing in forma pau-peris, for appointment of counsel, for in-junctive relief, and to amend the complaint, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farmer v. MHM Md., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03080-PWG (D.Md. July 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be-. fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.