U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina

Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 29, 2016

Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2206

JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2294

JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia and Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:15-cv-02841-MGL; 6:15-cv-03108-MGL)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.