Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina
Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2206
JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 15-2294
JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia and Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:15-cv-02841-MGL; 6:15-cv-03108-MGL)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.