United States v. Hassaan Rashaad

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hassaan Rashaad

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HASSAAN HAAKIM RASHAAD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order

denying Rashaad’s motion for clarification of the schedule of

restitution payments set forth in his 2002 criminal judgment.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United

States v. Rashaad, No. 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished