United States v. Eunice Husband

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Eunice Husband

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7699

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EUNICE HUSBAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-IMK-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eunice Husband, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Stein, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eunice Husband appeals the district court’s order denying

his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Husband, No. 1:08-cr-00016-

IMK-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished