Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7573

ROBERT COOPER,

Plaintiff - appellant,

v.

BRAD BRINEGAR; C. or F. DAVIS, B. PAYTON; CPL. LOGSDON; CPL. WILBURN; CPL. BARB; CPL. HENDRICKS; CHIEF MICHAEL P. THOMAS; CPL. S. A. WILSON; CPL. R. CONNER; CPL. J. FONTAIN; CPL. HETZ; CPL. M. DAVIS; OFFICER HENDRICKS; S. DILLEY; RONALD SHANE WEBER; FRANK BISHOP, JR.,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

SECRETARY GREGG HERSHBERGER; SERGEANT CRUMPAC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-03692-JFM)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Robert Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order

granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949).

The order Cooper seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished