Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar
Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7573
ROBERT COOPER, Plaintiff - appellant, v. BRAD BRINEGAR; C. or F. DAVIS, B. PAYTON; CPL. LOGSDON; CPL.
WILBURN; CPL. BARB; CPL. HENDRICKS; CHIEF MICHAEL P. THOMAS; CPL. S. A. WILSON; CPL. R. CONNER; CPL. J. FONTAIN; CPL. HETZ; CPL. M. DAVIS; OFFICER HENDRICKS; S. DILLEY; RONALD SHANE WEBER; FRANK BISHOP, JR., Defendants – Appellees, and SECRETARY GREGG HERSHBERGER; SERGEANT CRUMPAC, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-03692-JFM)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Robert Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Cooper seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.