Muhammad Al-Mujahidin v. Daniel Harouff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin v. Daniel Harouff

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7595

MUHAMMAD AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES; MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:14-cv-01266-BHH)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Al-Mujahidin seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished