U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Jonathon Patterson

United States v. Jonathon Patterson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2016

United States v. Jonathon Patterson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7766

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JONATHON TERRELL PATTERSON, a/k/a Joe-Joe, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathon Terrell Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina; John George Guise, Thomas A.

O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jonathon Terrell Patterson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) for a sentence reduction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Patterson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court granted Patterson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.