Michael Harris v. Judge Peter Messitte
Michael Harris v. Judge Peter Messitte
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2011
MICHAEL EVERRETT HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA E. LYNCH, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-2012
MICHAEL E. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. JUDGE PAUL VICTOR NIEMEYER; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-03807-RWT; 8:12-cv-03809-RWT)
Submitted: January 6, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Everrett Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for relief to reopen closed civil cases.
Based on our review of the record in these cases and Harris’ informal briefs on appeal, we conclude that these appeals are frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327 (1989). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.