U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

James Lomax v. Colin Ottey

James Lomax v. Colin Ottey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2016

James Lomax v. Colin Ottey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7597

JAMES MESHACH LOMAX, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURY, P.A.; FRANK BISHOP, Warden; BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Former Warden; R. RODERICK, Case Management Manager, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-02180-DKC)

Submitted: March 14, 2016 Decided: March 16, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Serra Aygun, Carolyn Israel Stein, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Elizabeth Erin Pavlick, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Washington, D.C.; Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey, No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug.

4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.