U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Arturo Baza

United States v. Arturo Baza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 2016

United States v. Arturo Baza

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7644

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARTURO NAVARRO BAZA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:06-cr-00116-BO-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 18, 2016

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arturo Navarro Baza, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Arturo Navarro Baza appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Baza, No. 7:06-cr-00116-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.