United States v. Charles Canady
United States v. Charles Canady
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7412
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES G. CANADY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-2)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles G. Canady, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Ethan A.
Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Charles G. Canady appeals the district court’s denial of relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2015). We deny Canady’s motion to appoint counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.