Charles Brower v. James Smith
Charles Brower v. James Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7977
CHARLES A. BROWER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAMES SMITH, Defendant – Appellee, and ROY COOPER, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03240-BO)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22,2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Brower, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Charles A. Brower appeals the district court’s order granting Dr. James Smith’s summary judgment motion on Brower’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims, and he has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brower’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Brower v. Smith, No. 5:13-ct-03240-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.