U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Loretta Lynch

Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Loretta Lynch
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2016

Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2323

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA E. LYNCH, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:14-cv-00215-BO)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wilder’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Wilder has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Wilder’s motions to appoint counsel and for a change of venue and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.