Carolyn Ford v. James Rohr
Carolyn Ford v. James Rohr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2356
CAROLYN W. FORD; JOSEPH FORD, SR.; RANDY C. FORD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JAMES F. ROHR; WILLIAM S. DEMCHAK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03158-RDB)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn W. Ford, Joseph Ford, Sr., Randy C. Ford, Appellants Pro Se. Jessica Hepburn Sadler, John Darren Sadler, Daniel J.
Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Carolyn W. Ford, Joseph Ford, Sr., and Randy C. Ford (Appellants) appeal the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their civil action for failure to properly serve Defendants, for lack of personal jurisdiction, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal brief does not challenge any aspect of the district court’s disposition, Appellants have forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.