U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Lemoyne Veney v. Tamera Fine

Lemoyne Veney v. Tamera Fine
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2016

Lemoyne Veney v. Tamera Fine

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6070

LEMOYNE VENEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, V. TAMERA LYNN FINE; MARK WALTER CROOKS; MANISHA GARNER; BRENDAN HURSON; ROBERT SPELKE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03965-RDB)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lemoyne Vesey appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Veney v. Fine, No. 1:15-cv-03965-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2016). We also deny Veney’s motions to amend the complaint, to strike the district court’s order, to disqualify the district court judge, to assign counsel, and for the production of transcripts and other documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.