U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

In Re: Larry McDaniel v.

In Re: Larry McDaniel v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 2016

In Re: Larry McDaniel v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1025

In Re: LARRY MAX MCDANIEL, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:11-cr-00252-D-1; 5:15-cv-00041-D)

Submitted: April 5, 2016 Decided: April 12, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Max McDaniel, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Larry Max McDaniel petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has dismissed McDaniel’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided McDaniel’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.