U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Roderick Black

United States v. Roderick Black
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2016

United States v. Roderick Black

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7787

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODERICK BLACK, a/k/a Roger, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W.

Boyle, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Roderick Black appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in his presentence investigation report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.