U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune

King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2016

King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2598

KING GRANT-DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY, of Wal-Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL-MART, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-04211-PMD)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant- Davis v. Fortune, No. 2:15-cv-04211-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2015).

We decline to consider the arguments Grant-Davis raises for the first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.