U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Joseph Daniels v. Paul Caldwell

Joseph Daniels v. Paul Caldwell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2016

Joseph Daniels v. Paul Caldwell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7884

JOSEPH A. DANIELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL E. CALDWELL, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judgment” that the district court construed as motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.