U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Andrew Jackson

United States v. Andrew Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2016 · Wilkinson, King, Keenan
646 F. App'x 336

United States v. Andrew Jackson

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Petition for Discovery of Voir Dire Examination Habeas Corpus § 121 Evidentiary Hearing.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.