U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Raphael Mendez

United States v. Raphael Mendez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 2016 · Wilkinson, King, Keenan
647 F. App'x 201

United States v. Raphael Mendez

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to remove his attorney. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.