John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-8030
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRIAN P. STIRLING; D. EASTRIDGE; OTHERS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02670-DCN)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Stirling, No. 9:15-cv-02670-DCN (D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2015; entered Dec. 10, 2015). We deny all of Baccus’s pending motions, including his motions for bail, to file an amicus curiae brief, to compel the production of videotapes, for a transcript at government expense, for disposition of informal briefing, and for judicial notice of his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.