U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkins

Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 2016

Antoinne Smith v. Sergeant E. Watkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7907

ANTOINNE SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SERGEANT E. WATKINS, Defendant – Appellee, and ROBERT GREEN, Warden; MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-03893-PWG)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoinne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell Frederick, Edward B. Lattner, Jody Lynn Malmstrom, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antoinne Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Sergeant Watkins, No. 8:13-cv-03893-PWG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2015). We also deny Smith’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.