U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Charlotte Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.

Charlotte Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2016

Charlotte Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2381

CHARLOTTE D. MOUNTCASTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PREMIER AUTO BROKERS INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK)

Submitted: April 5, 2016 Decided: April 28, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se. David Denman Hopper, COOK, HEYWARD, LEE, HOPPER & FEEHAN, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.