U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Darian Coleman v. Ass't Warden Randall Williams

Darian Coleman v. Ass't Warden Randall Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 17, 2016

Darian Coleman v. Ass't Warden Randall Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7503

DARIAN ANTONIO COLEMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ASSISTANT WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein; WARDEN JOHN PATE, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge. (8:14-cv-00748-DCN)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darian Antonio Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Christy L. Scott, SCOTT & PAYNE LAW FIRM, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Darian Antonio Coleman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Coleman v. Williams, No. 8:14-cv-00748-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.