United States v. Teresa Fletcher
United States v. Teresa Fletcher
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4699
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERESA LYN FLETCHER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:14-cr-00120-H-1)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Teresa Lyn Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Teresa Lyn Fletcher appeals the district court’s order denying Fletcher’s self-styled “Motion for Judicial Review of Forfeiture Order,” which Fletcher filed pro se in her criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fletcher, No. 5:14-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.