Gregory Smith v. Christopher Phillips
Gregory Smith v. Christopher Phillips
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6344
GREGORY VINCENT SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY; CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03161-RBH)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr., Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016). We also deny Smith’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.