U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

David Laux v. Board of Supervisors

David Laux v. Board of Supervisors
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 10, 2016

David Laux v. Board of Supervisors

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1018

DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W.

PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Defendants – Appellees, and THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: June 2, 2016 Decided: June 10, 2016

Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. David P. Bobzien, County Attorney, Cynthia A. Bailey Deputy County Attorney, Christopher A. Costa, Sara G. Silverman, Assistant County Attorneys, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the contentions on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laux v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334- LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.