United States v. Eric Giles
United States v. Eric Giles
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERIC GILES, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cr-00203-RJC-DCK-1)
Submitted: May 13, 2016 Decided: June 17, 2016
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Eric Giles appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial, which Giles filed pro se. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in either of the identified bases for the district court’s ruling. See United States v. Robinson, 627 F.3d 941, 948 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Giles, No. 3:09–cr–00203–RJC-DCK–1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.