United States v. Floyd Powell
United States v. Floyd Powell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, a/k/a Dick, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00012-V-6; 5:15-cv-00092- RLV)
Submitted: June 16, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for recusal as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Powell, No. 5:15-cv-00092-RLV (W.D.N.C. Jan.
19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.