Frederick Howell v. Alan Wilson
Frederick Howell v. Alan Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6111
FREDERICK L. HOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALAN WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:15-cv-02561-JFA)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick L. Howell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Frederick L. Howell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv- 02561-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.