United States v. Tysonn Manning
United States v. Tysonn Manning
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6198
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYSONN R. MANNING, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:12-cr-00042-MFU-8)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tysonn R. Manning, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tysonn R. Manning appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Manning, No. 7:12-cr-00042-MFU-8 (W.D.
Va. Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.