Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to reopen and to amend the judgment in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt, No. 5:11-cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015; Nov. 23, 2015). We deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *427 fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED