United States v. Isaac Sturdivant
United States v. Isaac Sturdivant
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6629
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1)
Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sturdivant, No. 1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.