United States v. Dion Williams
United States v. Dion Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DION LEVERING WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:12-cr-00047-HEH-RCY-4)
Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dion Levering Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia; Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dion Levering Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence.
Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Williams’ motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacks authority to grant motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.