U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Thomas Glass v. Ryder Integrated Logistic Corp.

Thomas Glass v. Ryder Integrated Logistic Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2016

Thomas Glass v. Ryder Integrated Logistic Corp.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1302

THOMAS GLASS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTIC CORP.; BETH TEAGUE, Inclusive, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03501-JKB)

Submitted: August 23, 2016 Decided: September 1, 2016

Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Glass, Appellant Pro Se. David William Erb, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Westminster, Maryland; Jason Alex Storipan, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Murray Hill, New Jersey, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Thomas Glass appeals the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glass v. Ryder Integrated Logistic Corp., No. 1:15-cv-03501-JKB (D. Md. Mar.

14, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.