U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

MFR Company, L.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust

MFR Company, L.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 8, 2016

MFR Company, L.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2115

MFR COMPANY, L.C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Fremont 2003-1, Asset-Backed Certificate, Series 2003-1; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; SUSAN BRASSFIELD-HAUSENFLECK, a/k/a Susan Brassfield; MICHAEL HAUSENFLECK; TRUSTEE SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, LLC, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher J. Williams, VOGELMAN, TURNER, & WRIGHT, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Maryia Y. Jones, John C.

Lynch, Jason E. Manning, Andrew B. Pittman, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: The Appellant, MFR Company, L.C., appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint and denying MFR’s motion to remand the case to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. MFR Co., L.C. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:15-cv-00407-CMH- IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.