Pamela Bunker v. United States Army
Pamela Bunker v. United States Army
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1565
PAMELA JO BUNKER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00243-REP)
Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela Jo Bunker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bunker’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.