U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Chantale Maffo v. Loretta Lynch

Chantale Maffo v. Loretta Lynch
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 3, 2016

Chantale Maffo v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1153

CHANTALE TETA MAFFO, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Julia J. Tyler, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Chantale Teta Maffo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and Maffo’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).

We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Maffo (B.I.A. Jan. 19, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.