U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Charles Patterson, Jr. v. Con Med

Charles Patterson, Jr. v. Con Med
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 4, 2016

Charles Patterson, Jr. v. Con Med

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6663

CHARLES DANTE PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CON MED; WARDEN OF BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-03303-JFM)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Dante Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Rigatuso, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland; Jordan Vernon Watts, Jr., BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles Dante Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Patterson’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Con Med, No. 1:15-cv-03303-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.