Sukcha Tharp v. Loretta Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sukcha Tharp v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1094

SUKCHA THARP,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Agency,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN)

Submitted: September 15, 2016 Decided: October 5, 2016

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sukcha Tharp appeals the district court’s order granting

Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for

summary judgment, on Tharp’s discrimination, harassment and

retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701

to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s judgment. Tharp v. Lynch, No.

1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2015). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished