Thomas Littek v. Harold Clarke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas Littek v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6703

THOMAS ANTHONY LITTEK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VDOC; FREDERICK SCHILLING, VDOC’s Medical Director; STANLEY YOUNG, Warden at PSCC; ADAM K. WYATT,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Corporation contracted to provide medical and dental services to VDOC,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00072-JLK-PMS)

Submitted: September 20, 2016 Decided: October 12, 2016

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Anthony Littek, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas Anthony Littek appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Littek v. Clarke, No.

7:16-cv-00072-JLK-PMS (W.D. Va. May 9, 2016). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished