U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.

Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 12, 2016

Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1395

KEVIN C. KLIK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a VERIZON VA; VERIZON SERVICES CORP., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 12, 2016

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin E. Williams, MEL WILLIAMS PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Betty S.W. Graumlich, REED SMITH LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kim M. Watterson, REED SMITH LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kevin C. Klik appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion and denying Klik’s summary judgment motion on Klik’s disability discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Klik v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.