Tawana Cooper v. Pamela Varouxis
Tawana Cooper v. Pamela Varouxis
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tawana Jean Cooper appeals the district court’s orders denying her complaint challenging a state court civil order regarding *189 a property issue and denying her post-judgment motions for reconsideration and to enter default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Cooper v. Varouxis, No. 1:16-cv-00025-CMH-TCB, 2016 WL 2894913 (E.D. Va. filed May 16 & entered May 17, 2016; June 14 & 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Cooper seeks damages because she believes that the Defendants committed fraud upon the state court, however, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar her claims. See Great W. Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP, 615 F.3d 159, 172-73 (3d Cir. 2010) (holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not deprive district court of jurisdiction in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action alleging that plaintiff's losses in state court action resulted from a conspiracy between the defendants and certain members of the state judiciary). Nonetheless, the district court correctly dismissed those claims for failure to state a claim.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.