United States v. Gary Whorley
United States v. Gary Whorley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7090
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GARY VINCENT WHORLEY, a/k/a Tyrone,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cr-00010-GMG-RWT-1)
Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Vincent Whorley, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gary Vincent Whorley appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion to produce notarized document.” We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Whorley, No. 3:15-cr-00010-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va., Aug.
1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished