United States v. Gary Whorley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gary Whorley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GARY VINCENT WHORLEY, a/k/a Tyrone,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cr-00010-GMG-RWT-1)

Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Vincent Whorley, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gary Vincent Whorley appeals the district court’s order

denying his “motion to produce notarized document.” We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Whorley, No. 3:15-cr-00010-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va., Aug.

1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished