Wendell Lloyd v. Dean Locklear

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wendell Lloyd v. Dean Locklear

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6636

WENDELL D. LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEAN LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional; OFFICER HOFFLER; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; INMATE GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION BOARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03262-BO)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell D. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wendell D. Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Lloyd’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Locklear, No.

5:15-ct-03262-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2016). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished