U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Wendell Lloyd v. Dean Locklear

Wendell Lloyd v. Dean Locklear
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2016

Wendell Lloyd v. Dean Locklear

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6636

WENDELL D. LLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEAN LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional; OFFICER HOFFLER; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; INMATE GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION BOARD, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03262-BO)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell D. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Wendell D. Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lloyd’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Locklear, No. 5:15-ct-03262-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.