Norman Askew v. Butch Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Norman Askew v. Butch Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6699

NORMAN BEN ASKEW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUTCH JACKSON; RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III; DREW STANLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03192-H)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Ben Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Norman Ben Askew appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askew

v. Jackson, No. 5:14-ct-03192-H (E.D.N.C. May 3, 2016). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished