Hesman Tall v. The Partnership Development

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hesman Tall v. The Partnership Development

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1532

HESMAN TALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC., (PDG); PDG REHABILITATIVE SERVICES; RISE PROGRAM; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; MARYLAND DIVISION OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03352-RDB)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Gimovsky, WALKER, MURPHY & NELSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland; Elliott L. Schoen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil action alleging claims under the Americans with

Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. The P’ship Dev.

Grp. Inc., No. 1:15-cv-03352-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished